“[N]ew residential development not only “pays its own way”, it also subsidizes existing residential units in the County”. This was a conclusion reached by a Urban Analytics after conducting a study paid for by taxpayers in response to the adequate public facilities ordinance (APFO) update of 2018.
If this statement does not sound familiar, it is the same conclusion a similar study reached fifteen years ago.
In 2005, economist Anirban Basu’s firm Sage Policy Group conducted a study for the Maryland Builders Association, in response to a slew of impact fee legislation adopted by several Maryland Counties and concluded "what we have found is that new development tends to more than pay for itself and disproportionately finances the growth in government…”
Now we have a record budget deficit.
Local politicians rely on the lack of information and lack of accountability to accomplish very little for the masses and a lot for the special interests.
Empty rhetoric and hollow promises with a dose of superficial actions are reserved for the voter, while concrete actions for the special interest, who are in this case major developers.
Certain members of Howard County’s Democratic Party are entrenched with these developers and a large part of the reasons for school overcrowding, the budget deficits, and other infrastructure issues can be directly attributed to them.
Here is a clear illustration of how this entrenchment plays out.
The Howard County Council Legislative Record Tracker has been updated with recent County Council votes.
As a taxpayer if you wonder why we have a budget mess, look no further than these votes. As a parent if you wonder why schools are overcrowded, look no further than these votes. As a voter if you wonder why little trust exists in the county process and accountability, look no further than these votes. As a resident who wants cares about affordable housing, if you wonder about why we lack it, look no further than these votes.
Howard County is like most counties plagued with leaders and policy influencers who espouse the orthodoxy that residential home construction is a source of positive revenues.
The county continues to subsidize Developer corporate profits thru low mitigation standards, low impact fees, and poor development regulations. This has resulted in "record" budget deficits, which will get worse unless the county changes course.
The Maryland State Legislature wants to amend the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) to increase the share of renewable energy production to 50% by 2030.
This aggressive goal is unrealistic, since Maryland has not even delivered on its existing goal to produce 14% of its energy with Tier 1 renewables by 2017. To date only 4% of its energy comes form these so-called Tier 1 sources.
Maryland needs nuclear power to meet its clean energy goals.
This week, I am thinking about the 1,338 (as of June 30, 2018) individuals who voted for me. Without a single doubt I can say these people believed in my campaign platform and knew exactly for what and for whom they voted.
I am also thinking about the volunteers who spent countless hours of their valuable time to knock on doors and cover the polling station.
I am thinking about those who held house parties for me and generously contributed to my campaign.
Finally, I am thinking about my campaign committee that included my mom who organized the most amazing fundraiser, the organizations who believed in me and endorsed my campaign, the many community activists and leaders who took time and spent countless hours to educate me on issues.
We are just getting started. As long as I have a platform and your continued support, I will speak out for fairness. I plan to remain engaged in county issues and combat special interest influence.
In the coming years, multiple opportunities will arise where the taxpayer could lose, while special interests gain billions:
School impact fees- over the last 15 years, the county has foregone at least $500 million in school impact fees that could have been used to build new schools.
The Downtown Columbia TIF- the second half of the tax increment financing (TIF)
The Laurel Park Station development and TIF- another developer is expecting TIF dollars to subsidize its profits.
Public Private Partnerships (P3s)- The proposed courthouse will utilize this creative scheme to siphon county dollars.
Comprehensive zoning rewrite- this could be another opportunity for developers to extract billions of dollars from public land.
The Savage Parkland Swap- this is another example of developer giveaway.
The Erickson Development- a developer is proposing the expansion of the planned service area (PSA), for water and sewer, using a so-called community enhancement floating (CEF) zone under the guise of solving a county problem.
We need to be vigilant and scrutinize every proposal to ensure the taxpayer does not lose.
Thank you for all the encouraging emails, phone calls, and texts. Running for county council has been an amazing experience and I am so grateful to everyone who supported me from the beginning.
I am running for county council to break the grip developers have on county government.
Many candidates have pointed to some nice attributes as qualification for the role of county council.
Experience, being a life-long Howard County resident, or having children have all been cited.
Let’s remember however, that many Howard County voters are not happy with some of the existing county leaders who have all of those attributes.
The questions a voter needs to answer are this: who will question and push back against special interests, not succumb to political party influence, and ultimately make decisions based on data?
My positions on many issues are clear and I have been the most outspoken candidate on issues of growth management and developer influence.
If a candidate is not willing to explicitly say what they will do before they get elected, how can we expect them to do what we need after they get elected?
We are exactly one month away from election day. Here are some campaign reminders and updates, including our successful fundraising cycle. Thank you to all who contributed!
Our campaign has received another major endorsement!
Thank you to Progressive Maryland and Progressive Howard County.
I am grateful for this endorsement. It is yet another validation that our campaign is talking about the issues people care about.
Our campaign has received another major endorsement from the Sierra Club!
I am very grateful for this endorsement from a group of citizens who devote so much of their time on difficult issues to protect our environment.
Development and climate change affect our local communities. Too often, the cost of doing business does not include the impact on the environment.
Taxpayer dollars can only be protected once we incorporate externalities to the cost of doing business.
I am committed to ensuring our environment and county revenue is protected by calling for such measures.
If you like authentic Habesha (Ethiopian/Eritrean) food or have always wanted to try it, this is your chance!
You are invited to attend a fundraiser for my campaign.
Spend the afternoon with us and experience a unique fundraiser with Habesha cuisine and music!
As a candidate, I made two important decisions: to not accept developer contributions and to provide concrete policy positions and a platform that addresses county-specific issues.
I strive to provide information to voters on county-specific issues. I want voters to elect a candidate that will address the county problems. I think the stakes are just too high for platitudes.
Between June 14 and 21 (early voting) and on June 26 (election day) voters have an important decision to make.
I humbly ask for your vote for the following reasons.
I am so grateful that The People's Voice has endorsed my campaign for county council.
The People's Voice is a civic and political organization that works to provide information to the voter on county-specific issues and pushes for transparency in the county government's decision making process.
The organization is comprised of citizen activists who are hyper-engaged in county issues. They understand these issues on a very deep level. They advocate on the environment, growth management, on behalf of the disabled, and many more issues critical to residents of Howard County.
Learn more about them here.
In the search for solutions, there are serious stakeholders and there are those who simply create obstacles.
In 2015, CDHC presented a recommendation that made 15% of housing affordable to households at an average of 60% of Average Median Income (AMI) - 1/3 would serve 40%, 1/3 at 60%, and 1/3 at 80%.
This was met with stiff resistance. Instead of providing any workable solution, developers enlisted organizations such as Howard County Chamber of Commerce, who sent a letter saying “we agree with the expectation that downtown Columbia will include expanded opportunities for in-town living in both housing for and affordability. The need for affordable, workforce housing is a goal shared by all. We do not, however, agree with the recommendations proposed by CDHC."
The public does not trust the process. County leaders have given everything in return for nothing. Exemptions, free money by way of tax-increment financing (TIF), very low fee-in-lieu exemptions, and developers' lack of good-will, has led to our current problem.
So the first thing to do is establish this trust in the process.
Next. No exemptions. Require a minimum of 10 to 15% affordable housing in all zoning districts of the county. New Town, Turf Valley, Maple Lawn, Village Centers, Downtown Columbia, River Hill, either have received exemptions or do not require any affordable housing.
Once the threshold is established, survey the county's existing affordable hosing inventory and the locations. In parts of the county where the threshold is met, require the developer to pay a fee that is market based.
Where possible revise existing agreements. If the Downtown Columbia DRRA can be renegotiated, we need to go back to the drawing table. I have already stated my concerns regarding the $90 million TIF the county has given to HHC. These questionable practices should be audited to protect the county's welfare.
Inclusionary zoning practices rather than practices that concentrate poverty in specific areas of the county should be the goal. If we continue in the current path, we will increase the segregation by income and race, which is already apparent. All we have to do is look at the free and reduced meal (FARM) percentages in certain schools.
We need solutions. Not platitudes.
We need problem solvers. Not obstacles.
The 2018 primaries will be held in June. Here are the times and locations for the two voting periods. Note that your early voting locations maybe different from the polling locations on election day.
Early voting: June 14th to 21st
Polling precinct locations: Find the locations here.
Election Day: Tuesday, June 26th.
Polling precinct locations: Find your location here.
Click here to check you voter registration status.
I feel truly honored by this endorsement. It is yet another validation that my campaign for county council is about regular citizens; not special interests.
My deepest gratitude goes to the members of Our Revolution Maryland and Howard County, who have put their faith in me to effect local changes by breaking developer influence in county government.
A fitting analogy to the question of where to build the next high school is found in the game of soccer. A player learns to pass the ball to where his teammate is going; not to where she is when the ball is passed.
When planning where to build the next high school, we need to consider where we will be in five years and beyond. We should build it where it will positively impact growth into the future.
The following factors should influence the decision to locate the next high school in Jessup.
- Our county is overcrowded in the northeast and the southeast;
- Our schools are segregated with low-income schools concentrated in the southeast, and school and neighborhood integration must be a priority; and
- It is time we finally pay attention to the southeast and its needs.
Earlier this month, the County Council voted on the much debated bill to update the adequate public facilities ordinance (APFO). During the debate, many proponents of a weaker APFO claimed that the unmitigated growth is not a problem.
But we know this is not true. Schools and roads cost money. If the revenue from construction of each additional home is not more than the cost it incurs by way of new school construction, road expansion or other expenses, the county loses money.
Within a few days of the vote, I testified in two different topics that illustrated how unmitigated growth and low impact fees, as well as the practice of providing tax increment financing (TIF) hurts the county's taxpayer.
Take a listen to these two short testimonies to learn more.
After the APFO bill the County Council passed in November of 2017 was declared invalid, the special interests who oppose any meaningful growth management process commissioned a report that "studied" the legislation's "Economic and Fiscal impacts" on the County.
The report has one specific goal. It wants to serve as a hit-piece and sow confusion on the debate, to then cause the delay of passage of legislation. Timing is important considering the need to raise school and road impact fees through State-enabling legislation.
If the County Council buys the argument that there are too many uncertainties, it will cause the State delegation to delay passage of its own bill that raises school and road impact fees until 2019 or longer.
Based on the content of the report as well as its timing it is not hard to conclude that a completely biased report that shows calamitous outcome was prepared. It further states that it is only "high level" because adequate time was not available to prepare a thorough review, even though the APFO legislation was first proposed in July of 2017.
As a result, it suggests more time is given for such a thorough review. This would stop the progress of APFO, prevent passage of State-enabling legislation, and help maintain the status-quo.
On January 16th 2018, the County Council held a hearing on a resolution to reduce the testimony time allowed to representatives of a group to three minutes instead of the current five minutes in order to make meetings “efficient”. I think it will have the reverse effect and aggravate groups.
Check out the video of my testimony here.